Impacts of Trauma

 Trauma

Trauma is a psychological and emotional response that individuals experience after encountering or witnessing an extremely distressing event or series of events that exceed their capacity to cope. Trauma is not solely dependent on the objective severity of the event, but rather on the individual's subjective interpretation and emotional experience (Van der Kolk, 2003). Traumatic events encompass a wide range of experiences, such as natural disasters, accidents, physical or sexual assault, war, or witnessing violence (Feliciano et al., 2008). Vulnerability to trauma varies among individuals and is influenced by several factors, including pre-existing mental health conditions, previous exposure to trauma, personal resilience, social support networks, and developmental stage. Certain populations are particularly vulnerable to trauma, such as children, refugees, survivors of interpersonal violence, individuals with a history of abuse or neglect, and those in high-risk professions like military personnel or emergency responders (Racine et al., 2020). It encompasses a range of subjective reactions, including intense fear, helplessness, and horror. Identifying those susceptible to trauma is crucial for implementing effective prevention and intervention strategies, as it allows for targeted support and resources to be provided to these individuals.

Trauma experience on intergenerational level

Intergenerational trauma refers to the transmission of traumatic experiences and their associated psychological and emotional effects across generations. The phenomenon arises when individuals indirectly experience trauma through narratives, behaviors, and family dynamics passed down from preceding generations. It is rooted in the concept of epigenetics, where changes in gene expression occur as a result of environmental factors, including traumatic events (Cerdeña et al., 2021). Such alterations are inherited and manifest in the form of heightened stress responses, emotional dysregulation, and psychological distress in descendants. Equally important, intergenerational trauma is perpetuated through various mechanisms, including the replication of maladaptive coping strategies, impaired attachment patterns, and disrupted family systems. The impacts of intergenerational trauma are complex and multifaceted, involving not only individual psychological well-being but also social and cultural dimensions, as affected individuals may face systemic marginalization and collective disadvantage (Shevell & Denov, 2021). Understanding the mechanisms and consequences of intergenerational trauma is crucial for developing targeted interventions and support systems to promote healing and resilience across generations.

Trauma experience over individual and family lifespan

Experiencing trauma can have profound and long-lasting effects on individuals and their families across the lifespan. Individual trauma experiences result in a range of psychological, emotional, and physiological responses, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, depression, and physical health issues (Feliciano et al., 2008). The effects persist and evolve over time, impacting various aspects of an individual's life, including their relationships, career, and one’s well-being. Similarly, the impact of trauma extends beyond the individual, affecting the family system as well. Trauma within a family disrupts attachment dynamics, communication patterns, and the general functioning of the family unit. Family members experience secondary trauma or vicarious trauma, where they internalize and are negatively affected by the primary trauma experienced by a family member (Erikson, 1991). Referring to Giesen (2004), intergenerational trauma occurs whereby trauma experiences are transmitted across generations, leading to a perpetuation of the traumatic effects within the family. As such, the experience of trauma have profound and complex ramifications on both the individual and the family system, necessitating comprehensive and specialized interventions to promote healing and resilience.

Pathophysiology of Trauma

The pathophysiology of trauma in relation to homelessness involves complex interplays between biological, psychological, and social factors. Individuals experiencing homelessness are disproportionately exposed to traumatic events, including physical and sexual abuse, assault, and witnessing violence, leading to a high prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Trauma disrupts normal stress response systems, resulting in dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, alterations in neurotransmitter systems (e.g., serotonin and dopamine), and increased inflammatory responses (Jones et al., 2001). Such physiological changes contribute to a cascade of health problems, such as chronic pain, sleep disturbances, cardiovascular disease, and immune dysregulation, which further exacerbate the challenges faced by individuals experiencing homelessness. The psychosocial consequences of trauma, including disconnection from social support systems, impaired coping mechanisms, and maladaptive behaviors such as substance abuse, also perpetuate the cycle of homelessness (Lord et al., 2014). As such, a comprehensive understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying trauma in relation to homelessness is crucial for developing effective interventions and support systems to address the complex health needs of this vulnerable population.

Correlation of Social Determinants of Health to the Effects of Trauma

The intricate interplay between social determinants of health and the effects of trauma manifests as a complex relationship characterized by multifaceted dynamics. Social determinants of health, encompassing socioeconomic status, education, employment, housing, and social support systems, significantly influence an individual's vulnerability to traumatic experiences and subsequent health outcomes (Racine et al., 2020). Adverse socioeconomic conditions, such as poverty and limited access to resources exposes individuals to higher levels of trauma, perpetuating a cycle of adversity. Notably, trauma itself disrupt social determinants by undermining education, employment prospects, and stable housing. The lasting impact of trauma on health is mediated through biopsychosocial mechanisms, including chronic stress, alterations in neurobiology, and impaired social functioning (Breslin et al., 2023). Consequently, such mechanisms interact with the social determinants of health, exacerbating health disparities and further marginalizing affected individuals.

The S/Sx of Trauma

The manifestations of trauma vary significantly, encompassing both immediate and long-term effects. Physically, trauma leads to bodily injuries, pain, or somatic complaints. Psychologically, individuals exhibit symptoms such as intrusive thoughts, flashbacks, nightmares, or dissociation, wherein they feel disconnected from their surroundings (Jones et al., 2001). Emotionally, trauma give rise to intense feelings of fear, anxiety, anger, guilt, shame, or sadness, often accompanied by difficulty in regulating emotions. Additional symptoms involve changes in cognition and perception, such as memory problems, disorientation, or a distorted sense of time. Similarly, traumatized individuals display altered interpersonal functioning, experiencing difficulties in trust, relationships, or social interactions (Breslin et al., 2023). In essence, the symptomatology of trauma is multifaceted and complex, encompassing a range of physical, psychological, emotional, cognitive, and interpersonal disruptions.

Difference Between Trauma Therapy and Trauma Informed Care

Trauma therapy and trauma-informed care are two distinct approaches that aim to address the needs of individuals who have experienced trauma, albeit with different focuses and methodologies. Trauma therapy primarily focuses on the treatment of trauma-related symptoms and the resolution of traumatic experiences through specialized therapeutic techniques, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing, or psychodynamic approaches (Breslin et al., 2023). It involves the active engagement of a trained therapist who guides the individual through the healing process, utilizing evidence-based interventions tailored to the specific needs of the client (Parker et al., 2021). On the other hand, trauma-informed care encompasses a broader framework that extends beyond therapeutic interventions. It is an organizational approach that acknowledges the pervasive impact of trauma and emphasizes creating an environment that promotes safety, trust, and empowerment for individuals who have experienced trauma (Classen & Clark, 2017). Trauma-informed care seeks to transform systems and practices by integrating knowledge about trauma and its effects into all aspects of service delivery, including policy development, staff training, program implementation, and organizational culture (Hales et al., 2019). It fosters a collaborative, strengths-based approach that prioritizes compassion, understanding, and sensitivity to the needs of trauma survivors, recognizing that trauma can significantly influence an individual's behavior, emotions, and overall well-being. Concisily, while trauma therapy concentrates on individualized treatment interventions, trauma-informed care operates on a systemic level to ensure that all interactions and services provided are sensitive to the unique experiences and needs of trauma survivors.

Trauma Related Distress

A trigger refers to a stimulus, event, or experience that elicits a strong emotional or psychological response in an individual, often leading to the reactivation or exacerbation of trauma-related distress. According to Carr et al. (2021), triggers are diverse, encompassing sensory cues, such as sights, sounds, smells, or physical sensations, as well as cognitive or emotional associations that remind individuals of their traumatic experiences. Recognizing trauma-related distress in someone involves observing and interpreting various indicators. Such visible signs of distress, such as heightened arousal, intense fear or anxiety, panic attacks, flashbacks, or emotional outbursts (Meis et al., 2019). Additionally, individuals exhibit avoidance behaviors, social withdrawal, changes in sleep patterns, hypervigilance, or difficulties in concentration and memory. Remarkably, it is crucial to approach distressed persons with sensitivity and adhere to ethical guidelines while assessing the degree of their trauma.

Noncompliance and Non-adherence of Traumatize Individuals

Individuals with a history of trauma exhibit behaviors that is primarily described as "noncompliance" or "non-adherence" within the context of therapeutic interventions or treatment regimens. In this context, Dawson‐Rose et al. (2020) argues that trauma-related experiences leads to a complex array of psychological and emotional responses, such as hypervigilance, avoidance, and mistrust, which can significantly impact an individual's ability to engage in prescribed treatment protocols. Referring to Meis et al. (2019), the responses manifest as resistance to authority, refusal to comply with therapeutic directives, or non-adherence to medication schedules. Such behaviors arise as a result of underlying issues, including the need for control, fear of re-traumatization, challenges with emotional regulation, or an attempt to protect oneself from perceived threats. As a result, it is crucial for healthcare providers to approach individuals with trauma histories with sensitivity, understanding, and a trauma-informed perspective to foster a therapeutic alliance and facilitate engagement in treatment.

Correlation of Trauma and Substance Abuse

Traumatic events, such as physical or sexual abuse, natural disasters, or combat exposure, elicit profound psychological distress, leading individuals to turn to substances as a coping mechanism. Trauma-related symptoms such as intrusive thoughts, emotional numbing, hyperarousal, and difficulties in emotion regulation further contribute to the development and maintenance of substance use disorders (Dawson‐Rose et al., 2020). Expounding on this, Breslin et al. (2023)specifies that the impact of trauma on neurobiological processes, including alterations in the stress response system and brain reward pathways, heighten vulnerability to addiction. In most cases, individuals turn to drug abuse as a means to cope with the emotional pain, distress, and dysregulation associated with trauma. According to the case study by Cerdeña et al. (2021), substance temporarily alleviate negative emotions and offers a sense of escape or numbing from traumatic memories. To others, substances such as alcohol and drugs is a form of self-medication to alleviate trauma-related symptoms, despite the potential for long-term negative consequences.

Conclusion

In summary, trauma represents a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that profoundly impacts individuals' psychological and physiological well-being. Figuratively, trauma has wide-ranging consequences, affecting not only the individuals directly experiencing traumatic events but also their interpersonal relationships, communities, and society at large. To address trauma holistically, a comprehensive development of effective strategies that promote resilience, healing, and the restoration of well-being among trauma survivors and their communities should be done.

 

For Research writing consultancy 
            Contact: researchwriters087@gmail.com

References

Breslin, M. A., Bacharach, A., Ho, D., Kalina Jr, M., Moon, T., Furdock, R., & Vallier, H. A. (2023). Social determinants of health and patients with traumatic injuries: Is there a relationship between social health and orthopaedic trauma? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 481(5), 901–908.

Carr, A., Zech, O., & Rollins, V. (2021). What is the best psychological treatment for pandemic-related distress and trauma? Evidence-Based Practice, 24(2), 10–11.

Cerdeña, J. P., Rivera, L. M., & Spak, J. M. (2021). Intergenerational trauma in Latinxs: A scoping review. Social Science & Medicine, 270, 113662.

Classen, C. C., & Clark, C. S. (2017). Trauma-informed care.

Dawson‐Rose, C., Shehadeh, D., Hao, J., Barnard, J., Khoddam‐Khorasani, L., Leonard, A., Clark, K., Kersey, E., Mousseau, H., & Frank, J. (2020). Trauma, substance use, and mental health symptoms in transitional age youth experiencing homelessness. Public Health Nursing, 37(3), 363–370.

Erikson, K. (1991). Notes on trauma and community. American Imago, 48(4), 455–472.

Feliciano, D. V., Mattox, K. L., Moore, E. E., Ball, C. G., Kozar, R., Alam, H. B., Inaba, K., Livingston, D. H., & Schreiber, M. (2008). Trauma. McGraw-Hill Medical New York.

Giesen, B. (2004). The trauma of perpetrators. Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity, 112–154.

Hales, T. W., Green, S. A., Bissonette, S., Warden, A., Diebold, J., Koury, S. P., & Nochajski, T. H. (2019). Trauma-informed care outcome study. Research on Social Work Practice, 29(5), 529–539.

Jones, L., Hughes, M., & Unterstaller, U. (2001). Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in victims of domestic violence: A review of the research. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 2(2), 99–119.

Lord, J. M., Midwinter, M. J., Chen, Y.-F., Belli, A., Brohi, K., Kovacs, E. J., Koenderman, L., Kubes, P., & Lilford, R. J. (2014). The systemic immune response to trauma: An overview of pathophysiology and treatment. The Lancet, 384(9952), 1455–1465.

Meis, L. A., Noorbaloochi, S., Hagel Campbell, E. M., Erbes, C. R., Polusny, M. A., Velasquez, T. L., Bangerter, A., Cutting, A., Eftekhari, A., & Rosen, C. S. (2019). Sticking it out in trauma-focused treatment for PTSD: It takes a village. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 87(3), 246.

Parker, M. M., Hergenrather, K., Smelser, Q., & Kelly, C. T. (2021). Exploring child-centered play therapy and trauma: A systematic review of literature. International Journal of Play Therapy, 30(1), 2.

Racine, N., Killam, T., & Madigan, S. (2020). Trauma-informed care as a universal precaution: Beyond the adverse childhood experiences questionnaire. JAMA Pediatrics, 174(1), 5–6.

Shevell, M. C., & Denov, M. S. (2021). A multidimensional model of resilience: Family, community, national, global and intergenerational resilience. Child Abuse & Neglect, 119, 105035.

Van der Kolk, B. A. (2003). Psychological trauma. American Psychiatric Pub.