Hieroglyphic Script
 |
| The Egyptian hieroglyphic script |
The hieroglyphic script used symbols and sounds to represent
meanings and sounds that made it a very efficient mechanism of writing. The use
of symbols and pictures allowed its users to compose a wide range of concepts
and words using few symbols. Unlike alphabets where one has to spell out every
word, a single hieroglyphic symbol could be used to represent a phrase or a
word. Therefore, the hieroglyphic script made it possible for the ancient Egyptians
to write a lot of information using relatively few symbols in a small space.
Mostly, the hieroglyphic scripts were common inscriptions on temple walls and
tombs in which the space to accommodate a lot of writing was limited (Davies
and Laboury, 2020). This work covers advantages and disadvantages of the hieroglyphic
script while looking into its geographic and historical context of its
inscriptions.
The ancient Egyptians used the hieroglyphic writing for about 3,500 years, from around 3100 B.C. to 400 A.D. Ancient Egyptians utilized the hieroglyphic system to write their language, and it was predominantly used in ancient Egypt, situated in the northeastern area of Africa (Schotter, 2018). The hieroglyphic writing was employed across the Nile Valley, from the northern delta area to the southernmost Nile cataract. It was also used in the Sinai Peninsula and the Eastern Desert, both of which were within the ancient Egyptian area of influence. The hieroglyphic writing was not used outside of Egypt, nor was it commonly recognized or understood by people from other countries (Chauvet, 2013).
However, the ancient Egyptians had interaction with other civilizations, and their script and language influenced the development of other writing systems in the area, including the Demotic script and the Greek alphabet. It is believed to have developed from the simpler hieratic script, which was used to record daily transactions (Love and Harris, 1989). The hieroglyphic writing was used for a larger variety of purposes, including the recording of religious texts, historical events, and legislation. Throughout its lengthy history, the hieroglyphic writing experienced several modifications. As the language progressed and got more complicated, the writing became increasingly intricate and harder to comprehend. Despite these modifications, the hieroglyphic alphabet remained in use throughout ancient Egyptian history, and it is still studied and enjoyed by historians and enthusiasts today (Polis, 2018). It is critical to note that the hieroglyphic script was an extremely effective writing style during its era. The hieroglyphic script allowed a broad variety of words and thoughts to be written with only a small number of symbols by employing symbols to express both sounds and meanings (Forman and Quirke, 1996). This form of writing was a reliable method of storing data during the period it was being used. The fact that hieroglyphic texts were frequently etched into stone gave them a very extended shelf life. Consequently, the ancient Egyptians were able to keep their information and data safe for a very long time (Assmann, 1994). Hieroglyphic script was highly flexible because there were several different ways in which the hieroglyphs could be written that included writing them horizontally, vertically, and in columns. This made it possible to write in the alphabet on materials such as papyrus, as well as on temple’s walls and as tomb inscriptions for a variety of uses. According to Chauvet (2013), the hieroglyphic script was known to have a great visual appeal. Therefore, the hieroglyphic script was well-known for its exquisite, elaborate symbols, which made it an attractive method of expressing information. Its widespread use and ongoing popularity in ancient Egypt were probably influenced by its aesthetics. As per Polis (2018) notes that the primary purpose of the hieroglyphic writing for the ancient Egyptians was to act as a means of recording and transmitting information. Additionally, the hieroglyphic script was used to record a broad variety of data, that included historical events, legislation, religious texts, and daily commerce. It was also utilized to memorialize the deceased and store information about the accomplishments of the living, since tombs and temple walls often included hieroglyphic inscriptions. In this manner, Shey (1998) argued that the hieroglyphic writing was essential to the cultural, religious, and political life of ancient Egypt.
Ancient
Egyptians regarded the hieroglyphic script as a holy writing system that was
strongly tied to their religion and culture. The writing was used to record
religious literature like as hymns, prayers, and rites, as well as the names
and titles of gods and Pharaohs on temple walls and other holy items (Vernus,
2020). The capacity to read and write hieroglyphs was restricted for a tiny,
elite group of scribes in ancient Egypt. In addition to keeping the state's
official records, which included laws, historical reports, and religious
writings, Stauder (2018) noted that the scribes were also responsible for
inscribing graves and temple walls. Due to its strong association with the
religious and cultural life of ancient Egypt, the hieroglyphic writing was
revered and often portrayed in religious art and artifacts. The writing was
very strongly associated with the Pharaohs and the royal court, and it was used
to express crucial information and the Pharaohs' power and authority
(Servajean, 2020).
The hieroglyphic writing proved
challenging to master. In addition, it was not an alphabet and as noted,
hieroglyphic script did not represent sounds in a standardized manner. As
explained by Vernus (2020), this made it challenging for anybody unfamiliar
with the script to learn how to read and write it. Moreover, it was hard to
compose. Due to the fact that the hieroglyphic alphabet employed individual
symbols to represent words and thoughts, writing lengthy texts tended to be
time-consuming. As such, this made it less useful for daily communication than
alphabetic scripts, which could be written more rapidly. Servajean
(2020) agrees that it
was inappropriate for some sorts of writings. The hieroglyphic writing system
was best suited for transcribing formal texts and inscriptions on stone or
other hard materials. As per Whittaker
(2018), it was not as well-suited for more informal, daily writings, such as
letters and personal notes, which were often written in a script called
hieratic. Also, it was mostly unknown outside of Egypt. The hieroglyphic
writing was employed only in ancient Egypt and was not widely recognized or
understood elsewhere. This restricted the ancient Egyptian civilization's
spread and impact (Davies and Laboury, 2020).
In summary, ancient Egyptians
recorded and communicated using hieroglyphic script. It was efficient because
it employed symbols to represent sounds and meanings to write a large variety
of words and thoughts with few symbols. Hieroglyphic writing was robust and
flexible, and was utilized for inscriptions on tombs, temple walls, papyrus,
and other materials. Although it was difficult to learn, its beautiful and elaborate
symbols gave the script a visually attractive means to communicate. It was
vital to ancient Egypt's cultural, religious, and political life, and
historians and enthusiasts still study and adore hieroglyphic writing.
<script async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-3557122163696795"
crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
Contact:
Email address: researchwriters087@gmail.com
Bibliography
Assmann,
J. (1994). Ancient Egypt and the Materiality of the Sign.
Chauvet,
V. (2013) “Between a tomb and a hard place: Tomb inscriptions as a source of
historical information,” Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt,
49(1), pp. 57–71. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5913/0065-9991-49-1-57.
Davies, V. and Laboury, D. eds. (2020). The
Oxford Handbook of Egyptian Epigraphy and Palaeography. Oxford University
Press.
Forman, W.
and Quirke, S. (1996) Hieroglyphs and the afterlife in ancient egypt.
London: British Museum Press.
Love, N.
and Harris, R. (1989) “Transcending saussure,” Poetics Today, 10(4), p.
793. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1772811.
Polis, S.
(2018) “Linguistic variation in ancient Egyptian,” Oxford Scholarship Online
[Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198768104.003.0004.
Polis, S.
(2018) “The functions and Toposyntax of Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs,” Signata,
(9), pp. 291–363. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4000/signata.1920.
Schotter, J. (2018) “Hieroglyphic modernisms.” Available at: https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474424776.001.0001.
Contact:
Email address: researchwriters087@gmail.com
Comments